Why should companies regularly review employee health insurance policies?

Employee health insurance policies are often renewed automatically year after year. Over time, reimbursement limits, price lists and coverage conditions may become outdated compared with real medical costs. When this happens, employees may receive smaller reimbursements than expected and begin to lose trust in the benefit. A regular review helps management understand whether the policy still matches employee needs and current market prices. It also shows whether the company receives reasonable value for the premium paid. Reviewing policies allows companies to adjust coverage limits, remove outdated restrictions and improve employee satisfaction without unnecessary spending.

What problems commonly appear in company health insurance policies?

Several common issues appear when a company health insurance policy has not been reviewed for years. Reimbursement price lists may be outdated, meaning medical services cost more than the policy covers. Dental or specialist services may include percentage limits that reduce the actual reimbursement employees receive. Some benefits may have unrealistic limits that do not match current healthcare prices. Another indicator is a low claims ratio compared with the premium paid, which may signal that coverage is not effectively used. These problems reduce the real value of the insurance benefit and often lead to employee dissatisfaction.

How can companies understand what employees need from health insurance?

Employee feedback is one of the most useful sources of information when reviewing health insurance benefits. A short survey written in clear and simple language helps companies understand how employees actually use the policy. The survey can reveal which services employees use most often, which reimbursements are too low and which benefits are rarely used. This information helps management make decisions based on real usage instead of assumptions. Understanding employee needs allows companies to improve coverage in the areas that matter most while avoiding unnecessary spending on benefits that employees rarely use.

How do companies compare different health insurance offers?

Comparing health insurance offers requires more than simply looking at the price. Policies often contain different limits, exclusions and reimbursement structures. A structured comparison process allows companies to place each offer side by side and evaluate coverage details such as service limits, reimbursement percentages, waiting periods and exclusions. A detailed comparison helps management clearly understand which offer provides the best balance between cost and coverage. Without a structured comparison, important differences between policies may remain hidden and lead to unexpected limitations after the policy begins.

Why do companies request improvements from insurers before making a final decision?

Initial insurance offers are often negotiable. Companies may ask insurers to adjust prices, remove unnecessary limitations or add additional medical services before selecting a final policy. This negotiation step allows companies to improve the balance between coverage and cost. By requesting adjustments, management gains better control over the final structure of the insurance benefit. The result is usually a policy that better reflects employee needs while maintaining predictable costs for the company.

How does clear communication help employees use company health insurance effectively?

Even a well designed health insurance policy may be underused if employees do not clearly understand the coverage. Simple explanations of benefits, reimbursement rules and limits help employees know when and how to use the insurance. Informational materials and meetings allow employees to ask questions and understand how the policy works in everyday situations. Clear communication reduces confusion, increases the actual use of the benefit and improves employee satisfaction with the company health insurance program.

How Employee Health Insurance Policies Are Selected for Companies

Guntis Zoldners
1 day ago
3 min read

a broker guiding a company through company health insurance

Employee health insurance is one of the most requested, yet also one of the most misunderstood employee benefits.

Policies are often purchased simply because they are expected, without carefully evaluating their content or quality. This case study shows how situations like this are addressed in practice when selecting company health insurance for employees.

The Beginning of the Collaboration

A company from the food wholesale industry with around 40 employees contacted us. Their existing policy had been renewed with the same insurer for many years.

On paper everything appeared acceptable, but employees regularly complained about difficulties receiving reimbursements. In many cases the compensation paid by the insurer was significantly lower than the amount employees had actually paid for medical services, which created frustration.

The First Step: Meeting and Analysis

We met with the HR manager and the accountant to understand how the existing policy was being used and what employees thought about it.

It quickly became clear that no employee survey or satisfaction analysis had ever been conducted. The insurance policy had gradually become a routine administrative task rather than a meaningful employee benefit.

The Action Plan

We proposed a structured process to clarify the situation:

Analysis of the existing policy,
Requesting claims statistics from the insurer (with client authorization),
Preparing an electronic survey to collect employee feedback,
Preparing market offers based on real usage data and employee needs.

Results of the Initial Analysis

Several problems became immediately visible:

The reimbursement price list was outdated. For example, ultrasound reimbursement was capped at €25, while the real market price exceeds €40.
Dental coverage included built-in limitations (price lists plus percentage reimbursement), meaning employees often received only about 30% of what they actually paid.
The rehabilitation limit was €10 per visit, which is far below realistic market costs.
The claims ratio was only 64% compared to the premium paid, while in the market a healthy ratio is typically 90–120%.

Employee Survey

We created a short survey written in simple and clear language.

The goal was to understand:

what prevents employees from using the policy,
what coverage should be improved,
which benefits are unnecessary.

Developing Market Offers for Company Health Insurance

Two insurance scenarios were prepared:

“Similar to the current policy but without its weaknesses”
“Improved coverage aligned with actual employee usage”

We collected offers from eight insurance companies.

The received proposals came in different formats: PDFs, email texts, and various structures.

Our Comparison Method

To evaluate the offers objectively, we use our own comparison framework with around 150 criteria.

Each insurer’s proposal is placed side by side, clearly showing:

what is included and what is excluded,
coverage limits,
reimbursement levels,
financial impact.

We also prepare a simple dashboard for managers and accountants so they can clearly see which factors influence the company’s budget.

Offer Improvements

For the three strongest proposals we requested additional improvements, including:

price adjustments,
removal of unnecessary limitations,
additional medical services.

Presentation to the Client

After two weeks of work, the client received a structured comparison that allowed them to make a confident decision without wasting internal time.

They selected a policy with significantly better coverage and only a minimal increase in price.

Communication with Employees

To ensure employees fully understood the new insurance:

we prepared a clear information guide,
organized a Zoom meeting where employees could ask questions,
and continue to support the company throughout the year with policy updates (for new or departing employees).

Conclusion - Health Insurance for Employees

A professional insurance broker does more than compare prices.
A structured evaluation process removes uncertainty, saves management time, reduces stress, and improves employee wellbeing.
When the decision is based on real usage data and clear comparisons, companies gain better control over both costs and employee benefits.

+371 26 668 558

In person or remote

Konsultācija uzņēmuma vadībai

30min

Reserve now